According to this study, having a cat (as we all know, we don’t own them) reduces your risk of a heart attack by almost a third:
Cat owners “appeared to have a lower rate of dying from heart attacks” over 10 years of follow-up compared to feline-free folk, Qureshi said. The magnitude of the effect — a 30 percent reduction in heart attack risk — “was a little bit surprising,” he added. “We certainly expected an effect, because we thought that there was a biologically plausible mechanism at work. But the magnitude of the effect was hard to predict.”
Now take a look at the guy above, who is part of my work environment, and tell me that it isn’t so. I’m just wondering whether having two means a 60 % reduction?
(Via Slashdot)


Blog posts in English
English RSS feed

kongharald | 11-Mar-08 at 10:34 am | Permalink
Maybe you can achieve immortality by having 3 1/3 cats
Better teach all politicians and journalist and serial offenders what the principle “Correlation does not imply causation” means.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation
Anette | 11-Mar-08 at 11:04 am | Permalink
I knew it
That’s the reason we’ve got 4 beautiful cats - and even more som a reason to get more…..
Håper vi vil fortsette å treffes fra tid til annen. Vil savne deg i NBFs HS
Eirik | 12-Mar-08 at 7:52 am | Permalink
Anette: Bodil is such a beaut! Ellers er det jo bare å invitere meg som ekstern bidragsyter til HS om eller når dere trenger det. Du har adressen min!
b | 29-Mar-08 at 9:44 am | Permalink
completely besides the point: det finnes virkelig vakre katter som heter bodil! hurra!
og ja…NYDELIG.
vi har to katter. de gjør hverdagen mye lykkeligere, både mentalt og fysisk. det er det lite tvil om.